The latest report from the UN is apparently yet another significant piece of evidence proving the effect of humans on climate change.
How much longer can people keep denying this? Is this going to be another version of the evolutionary theory debate? Except in this instance the future of the planet as we know it could be at stake.
What a generation to be alive - possibly one of the last to witness the world as it once was? The shift of the human psyche to one of rampant individualism couldn't be better expressed than the destruction of the planet, thereby ensuring we are the most remembered generation of all - possibly and ironically, with no-one left to remember us in a few generations. Perhaps all the prophecies of
Armageddon style weather patterns will actually prove themselves to be vaguely accurate?
My prediction is that as the desperation for rapidly diminishing natural resources takes hold, and eventual economic decline in the US occurs - fear will grip the hearts of populations and governments alike. Fear of losing the quality of life we once took for granted, fear of change and fear of the unknown. Like a pack of animals, countries and individuals will climb over each other, trampling the weakest as they make final lunge for the remnants of a past life. Economic invasions such as the ones already witnessed in developing countries and protectionist trade policies will be the start of the economics warfare - then what? Foreign reserve dumping, trade
embargoes and alliances between countries amongst all of this. Eventually leading the defence agencies to 'prepare for the worst' and make sure their missiles are pointed in the right direction - prompting 'the enemy' to do the same. And rest will be history - possibly discovered by another species that may evolve in a few million years.
Sounds dramatic? It's already happening and it won't take much to take the blocks out from under the wheels and allow the machine of humanity to career off into oblivion.
That is unless something is done now. If people stop making excuses for the lifestyles we have become accustomed to, if fingers are pointed, if action is taken, if policies are implemented.
What is the point in denying that this is an essential course of action? To be contrary? To not be called a '
greenie' by cretins? To tow the party line of conservatives and their white hooded friends?
If you are in denial that radical action is required, ask yourself why. Why ignore the facts? Why take the risk? Why gamble with the future of humanity for the sake of your own petty comforts?
I just hope we have a Crimes Against Humanity tribunal in 50 years that will bring some justice against the polluters and the excessively wealthy.