This is my blog. It's been going for a couple of years now. I'll keep writing in it from time to time, often for no particular reason.

Thursday, July 20, 2006

Love

I've written posts on economic policy, religion, travel, socialism and sociology, but I have never really discussed an underlying and important concept that runs through everything. Love.

There are several kinds of love. Love for your partner or soul mate, love for your parents, siblings and children, love for your friends and also the more Buddhist and seldom discussed love for your fellow human and the universe in general. An enlightened person (from the Buddhist point of view) is one who deeply feels this love for the universe before any other emotion. My opinion is that this sort of love is the highest attainable goal for all humans and requires years of study and thought to acheive. But the most often sought after love is the love for a partner. And will be the topic of my little 'late night unable to sleep' rant (maybe not the best time to write posts).

It is a fairly common discussion that 'the word love gets thrown around too easily these days'. I have heard this conversation a number of times and I agree wholeheartedly. How often do you see people claiming they are in love before jumping ship at the first sign of inclement weather?

I blame the way our world has become so individualisitic, people choose their partners because there is something in it for them. As soon as love needs to be requited for it to exist and flourish it is nothing more than a self-serving agenda.

When someone tells you they love you it is very hard not to believe them, we all want to be loved and if someone is throwing the L-word at us we will very happily take it. But with the issue of that word being used too flippantly, I think it comes down to not understanding what the price of love is. People suddenly feel these intense emotions and think they can't bear to live without the object of their affections, they burst with professions of love and desire. But when faced with hardship and personal sacrifice they quietly eat their words and pretend that something else was to blame other than their own unripe spirit and selfish perspective.

Love is pain, it is sacrifice, it means swallowing pride and deflating the ego, it means putting oneself second or third or last. It is not a joyride of romance and happiness.

It is the most fullfilling and enriching experience that colours what would otherwise be a monochrome life, but it is not within the reach of those people whose personal ambitions take priority.

8 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Wow Nick - heavy stuff! I must confess that I have been one of those people that has thrown the word around too flippantly, usually very early on in a relationship... and guess what, I usually change my mind a month or two later. It's something I have to try and curb!

A more cynical outlook on love (especially the love-for-a-partner-type-love) is that it's simply a socially acceptable form of insanity (or mental illness). I think there's a lot of truth in that cynical statement. Love (often confused with infatuation) can take over one's every waking thought, and can make you feel the highest and lowest extremes of emotion... much like being bipolar or manic depressive.

And as for the concept of a soul mate, I don't believe such a thing exists. Further, I think the premise of believing in a soul mate is actually very egocentric. Taking into account that there are some six billion people on the planet, and then saying that only one of them is really right for you (or is worthy of your love), that has to be an egocentric attitude right?

Cheers mate... keep on thinking and feeling.

Rob

Thursday, July 20, 2006 11:12:00 am

 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Pretty deep post… I have to admite I do agree that ppl tend to use the L-word too losely. I'm not sure if it comes down to not understanding. I think it is the case for some but for other's desperation to be loved plays a massive part. I agree that some are unaware of the price of love and when faced with obstacles and hardship do tend to turn away and sometimes find/search for someone new instead of facing the obstacle with the one they apparently "love". Like you I believe love is pain, sacrifice and putting oneself behind the needs of other's, I do however also think that if you are lucky enough to find the person to stand by you through a series of lifes obstacles and honestly be able to look at that person and know without a doubt you not only trust but also respect them and all that they stand for and still be able to laugh with an existing spark of romance then you can also experience a joyride of happiness.

I must admite I'm far from a love struck girl and very rarely use the word, especially when it comes to relationships of the romantic type, there's an element of fear and rejection which I think exists in us all it's just that the degrees tend to differ. Guess it's prob one of if not the most complex emotion of all.

Just my thought.

Lauren

Friday, July 21, 2006 2:00:00 pm

 
Blogger futureshock101 said...

Nice writing mate! Do I dare ask what has brought about this rant?

I had a exceptionally cynical mate once state that "love does not exist". He made such a statement after his heart had once again been broken by the opposite sex. Maybe life would be a hell of a lot easier if there was no romantic love in the world, just unbridled passion and lust ;-o

As for myself I agree with the negative impacts rampant individualism in the west has had upon the value and meaning of love in our contemporary context. Can any self focused achiever really know the true meaning of love? I think not.

Maybe something from the bible (NB - all religious texts have truth, not only Buddhist ones) might be relevant here.

I Corinthians 13:4-8:

Love is patient, love is kind.
It does not envy, it does not boast, it is not proud.
It is not rude, it is not self-seeking.
It is not easily angered, it keeps no record of wrongs.
Love does not delight in evil, but rejoices with the truth.
It always protects, always trusts, always hopes, always perseveres.
Love never fails.

Mate, love is not about "feeling warm and soft inside"

Keep up the good writing dude!

Sunday, July 23, 2006 10:02:00 pm

 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Here Here. I think you've nailed it - Love requires work, as we discussed up at Assekrem.

Rob and I in Herat safe and sound, Afghanistan is so different from anything I hae ever seen. You must make the trip here. Will email some hot tips later.

sending you lots of sibling love
xoxo

Wednesday, July 26, 2006 4:31:00 am

 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Nice to see you grappling with the big issues.

Try tracking down a copy of "The Four Loves" by C. S. Lewis.

And a question for you: from whence comes the human capacity for love?

PS Great citation Lucas.

Thursday, August 10, 2006 1:13:00 pm

 
Blogger Nick said...

An interesting question, which could either be answered from a cynical angle (ie. it stems from self-interest) or a more optimistic approach (ie. it comes from an innate desire to preserve the life - and quality of life for fellow species - which still supports the hypothesis that the concentric circles of our love is created from our selfishness (ie. neighbour is loved ahead of another human on the other side of the world).

ps. The bible quote is just a paraphrase of what has been said by philosophers for eons. It has the same significance as a Walt Whitman poem.

Thursday, August 10, 2006 4:27:00 pm

 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Gee Nick, you don't think there might be more possibilities than just those two? What a small universe you live in.

"Philosophers have been saying it for eons." Even if this were true, what would it prove?

At any rate, I've checked my 'Nicomachean Ethics' and, can't seem to find any parallel to the universalist and self-sacrificial "agape" expressed in 1 Corinthians 13. Could you please let me know which philosophers you are referring to.

Take care.

Saturday, August 12, 2006 12:33:00 am

 
Blogger Nick said...

Should I encompass every possible angle with every possible response should I? What an unrealistic expectation....

Try starting with Socrates, then maybe Aristotle, I think they have the bible beaten hands down with useful philoshophy for an approach to life - eg. to live 'ethically'. It goes to prove that 'divine revelations' and rules for life based on some superstition are not new ideas on how humans should conduct themselves.

Sunday, August 20, 2006 4:30:00 am

 

Post a Comment

<< Home