A man and his dog
I mean 'a' dog. It isn't mine. Young Cooper is my brother's Westie/Norfolk terrier cross. Not that I know exactly what a Westie is, but I'm guessing his parents aren't from Penrith.
Cooper and I have been having a quiet few days (with the exception of one day of insane bicycle couriering - but I'll get to that). We've been chatting about the causes of, effects from and solutions to the human condition of misery and what indeed, if there is one, is the definition of human misery. On a side note, this is not because I am miserable, rather I have:
a) been stimulated into thought by Lucas and Farah's recent posts; and
b) written very little about the goings on in the grey matter of my head, other than where I've been, what I saw and what (most importantly) I ate.
I began by pondering out loud, after reading the latest blogs from from Farah and Lucas and their subsequent comments, about how much I agree with their latest suggestion that politics and economics should be free from the doctrines of any and every religion (this is no more obvious than the 'end of days' attitude pervading US foreign policy). Why can't the leaders of the world put their nationalist egos to one side and look at the real problems in the world - and their causes??
As I sat there in a moment of frustration with powerful white men and the ignorant fearful white electorate, Cooper suddenly piped up "well old chap, when you look at it closely and from afar, it is (like everything bad) a cycle as vicious as a Roald Dahl 'knid'" He went on to describe the following heartening description of how our world seems to be spiraling into oblivion:
Terrorism:
People suffer (in terms of education, health and financially), they turn to fundamental religion for a reason to eke out their fragile existence, their lives become devalued in the face of their mighty deity, they learn to hate (often quite rightly) their economic oppressors (and often guided by those with hidden agendas). The result is Jihad in its many forms. Governments and public fear the terrorists, nationalism and xenophobia takes hold, conservative militant governments (like Howard and Bush) come to power (or hold onto power), embargoes ensue, war ensues, the people suffer......
"That was a fairly simplified example - the result, however, is invariably the same" growled Coops in an ominous tone.
"ah", I said, "but what exactly is suffering? Who is to say that one person is suffering and another is not when we don't know the inner workings of their mind?"
Cooper sighed wearily, "And I suppose you are going to say that we, in the West, are suffering just as much with our burden of fast paced living and anxiety disorders....all in the pursuit of more comfort and more wealth?". He finished the sentence with a raised eyebrow and I didn't dare agree that I was about to say almost exactly those words, although as he said it I realised that we aren't suffering at all. We have the freedom of choice. If we wanted to live a simple life of subsistence we could quite easily take that option, without fear of starvation. But so many of us choose to pursue, what we consider, a higher standard of living - we are in any case - rational beings, are we not?
"So" I said to Cooper, "What exactly is suffering then?" He seemed to perk up at this question, then flooded me with following information:
"Overpopulation/Poverty/Infant mortality/Low life expectancy/Illiteracy:
These are all features of how I define suffering. Some people say that when you go to a poor country everyone seems just as happy with their lot in life as we do in the West. Maybe this was more accurate 20 years ago when the vast inequality in the world wasn't quite so vast and wasn't so acutely visible to those living in squalor.
Approximately 2.7 billion people are living on less than $2 a day.
But what if we counted EVERYONE living in 'poverty'. By poverty I mean the nationally determined poverty lines of each country that takes into account the cost of living and welfare programs in that country - not the $1 or $2 a day figure that is applicable in some countries with extremely low costs of living (and how many of those people live on $2.05 a day and aren't counted?). The poverty line is such that costs for bare minimum survival can just be met, with not a cent to spare for investment in any assets (whether that be a stove that works or a new water bottle that doesn't leak the precious water that has been carried for miles each day)."
I sat there quietly for a moment while it sank in. Imagining, at the bare minimum, everyone in Australia multiplied by 135 times, all living on less than $2 a day, and many with barely more than that. But what could I do? One person who is going to be a poorly student again soon - I can't buy and build schools. I said this to Cooper and he replied:
"You can do four things.
1. Do your little bit, sponsor a child, donate to a charity regularly, anything - it doesn't have to be much.
2. Make sure you invest in ethical organisations. And by investment I mean your career as well - that is the biggest investment you will ever make.
3. Vote for a government with a global conscience, not one that instills fear into the public and closes the minds of a generation.
4. Probably the most important thing you can do is to pass on this message. The more people that know about the catastrophe going on under their noses and feel empowered to do the little and the big things, the less suffering there will be in the world, and isn't the ultimate goal after all to make the world a better place?"
"absolutely right" I said to Cooper, "I'm going to write a blog about it right now, can you give me a hand?"
But he just stared at me with his tongue hanging out, then rolled over and started biting his groin.
12 Comments:
If only we were all dogs and could finish a serious intellectual conversation with biting our groins... Hmmm... If only I could bite my groin ;-p
I agree little things help. Unfortunately in reality if there isn't a serious realignment of priorities at a global level the whole world will fall apart and war, death and anarchy will ensue... What we need are real revolutionaries with the power to make big changes at a national level. Small moves are just not enough when we only have 50 years of old left and are rapidly approaching the point of no return with Co2 levels etc.
Sorry just felt like being negative. Lovely piece of writing though mate... a pleasure to read and I agree with your assessment :-)
Thursday, September 28, 2006 4:33:00 am
Love your blogs, Nick!
Have to agree that we need to put our voice foward, but am incredibly cynical when it comes to voting for a government which doesn't instill fear in a population. As far as I understand, the people of the US already tried this, and it didnt work...
And maybe this means relatively little in the scheme of things, but I think that a persons view on the political agenda of the world is very dependent on where they live... yes I know how shit it is in many of the western countries, but in places such as France, Belgium and Holland, in general, it isnt about instilling fear in the general population, rather adopting plans to be as far removed from the US (and its followers) as possible (sometimes a little too anti-) and bringing this awareness to children in primary schools... Maybe I am optimistic, but I think this might spread...
Thursday, September 28, 2006 5:42:00 am
Ok - I just can't help being contrary, so here's the other side of the debate:
1. Inequality and Poverty are, by some measures, on the improve. World Bank data shows small, but real, reductions in poverty and inequality over the past thirty years (1987: 1183 million people under $1 a day and 1175 million by 1997). Not great, but heading in the right direction...
2. Fear drives political thought, both on the left and right. Fear of global warming is just as real as fear of terrorism. Fear of US power is just as real as fear of immigrants. Fear of failing the world's poor is as real as fearing the judgment of a materialistic society.
3. On terrorism - studies show that those drawn to terrorism are rarely the dissafected and poor. Rather, it is middle class religious elites, who feel their traditional power over their previously poor, disconnected uneducated communities is waning...hence, fight the system, by blowing it up. As the nobel laureate economist Joseph Schumpeter observed, "The nature of capitalism is to unseat hierachy, a process of creative destruction".
4. Innovation and democratisation are on the advance. California is reducing its Co2 emissions to pre-1990 levels. India and Pakistan are working together on security problems. Global literacy rates are on the rise. India and China are rising peacefully. Big countries don't fight each other anymore. Everyday more people in more places spend time, money and effort working on solving the big problems.
If you take a historical long-view The world is getting better, and while its got a long way to go, there are many positive aspects of the current global order.
I'm aware of the bad stuff...it's in our face everyday on the TV news. But, a balanced view is important.
Thursday, September 28, 2006 9:15:00 am
1. Inequality and poverty has improved on average because it has improved so much in China and South East Asia. Africa has actually gotten worse in the past 20 years. That's the problem with looking at aggregate numbers and feeling pleased with the outcomes.
2. That is tantamount to saying that Communists are actually economic rationalists in disguise because they are maximising their own utility by seeing a system of equality. And indeed that is what the entire world is made up of - some people have their utility maximised by feeling secure, others do so by helping others. It would be pedantic and narrow minded to start linking compassion with fear.
3. So do the studies say that the middle class elites are blowing themselves up (thus defeating the purpose of fighting for their power back) or are they the ones instigating the suicides and enocurage the disaffected to blow themselves up? No doubt Osama bin Laden and Mussawi are not poorly educated strugglers, but they're not blowing themselves up either.
4. Of course innovation and education are on the advance. No question about that. But are we just slowing down the rate at which we deteriorate? or are we going the other way - not a chance. Cutting back on CO2 emmissions is a start, but by no means a laudable achievement - it's like an 18 year old learning to walk. There is still a massive crisis and no room for sitting around patting each other on the back.
The bad stuff is not in our face every day. We see Iraq and Darfur and fighting and wars, we don't see people suffering (a 2 minute report on the 40000 civilian deaths in Iraq, ha) - unless you are actually looking for it. Does the news have a daily death toll from starvation? No. Does it count the number of drunken Aussies killing themselves in cars over the Easter break? Yes. If that doesn't make you cringe, laugh and cry all at the same time then you need to think about it more seriously. How much money is spent trying to stop drunken Australians from driving and killing themselves? How many lives does it save? How many starving Africans would be saved for the same amount of money and they aren't choosing to be reckless drunken idiots.
Thursday, September 28, 2006 6:06:00 pm
Yep, I agree there is massive problems...I was just, as I said, being contrary...
But one thing I have to insist on, because I study it and teach it, is the point on terrorism - there is a very weak, if a non-existent link between terror and poverty. As you say, Africa is the heart of poverty...not many African terrorists.
Also - 9/11 hijackers all middle class and eduacted....Bali suicide bombers - middle class and educated, more than three quaters of the suicide bombers in Afghanistan are non-Afghanis from relatively eductaed backgrounds in Pakistan, Yemen or Saudi Arabia...same in Iraw...Poor people are thinking about their and their children's next meal, not blowing themselves and other people up.
Thursday, September 28, 2006 10:50:00 pm
Mel said that my posts are too antagnistic... I'm not trying to be, just like a good healthy debate and a bit of cage rattling!
Sorry... look forward to seeing you soon.
Thursday, September 28, 2006 11:03:00 pm
not at all. I am all for a debate.
Obviously I am not as schooled on the profiles of terrorists - but to say there is nearly a non-existent link between poverty and terrorism might be ignoring an underlying problem. Sure, not many terrorists from Africa, yet. But where do they come from? They are certainly not Americans, Australians, Canadians, or Europeans. Some of them might grow up in these regions, their links, support, ideas etc are all driven (if not directly) from places like Pakistan. People who associate themselves fully with an economically thriving nation do not become terrorists. Maybe they feel angry that their 'brothers' are living in inhuman conditions because of the policies of the West? I think that, if only one among many reasons, is a fairly strong link.
Friday, September 29, 2006 12:29:00 am
Not at all. I am always up for a good debate.
I still maintain there is a link between poverty and terrorism. And that link is strong enough to make people start worrying about the effect poverty is having their own lives through terrorism.
Friday, September 29, 2006 7:26:00 pm
sorry, i wrote that second last comment yesterday, but it didn't publish, so i wrote another (shorter) reply, both have now published themselves.
Friday, September 29, 2006 7:31:00 pm
Nick, I have just read your post for the first time and I am very impressed! I really think you, Lucas and I are going to have to team up in the future and put our thoughts into action.... I'm already starting with little things, and soon we'll take over the world!
I also can't wait to meet Cooper. He sounds like wise old Yoda to me!!
Sunday, October 01, 2006 1:36:00 pm
Hmmm i note Nick has been absent for a few days... Has Cooper eaten him???
Lauren
Thursday, October 05, 2006 7:29:00 am
He's ok everyone... Just been busy looking after me. We leave for India tomorrow so plenty of posts to come shortly.
Friday, October 06, 2006 8:11:00 pm
Post a Comment
<< Home